Legal Opinion

Burt v. Blumenauer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1987No. A8112-07353; CA A38623PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Defendants petition for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, of our decision in this case, 84 Or App 144, 733 P2d 462 (1987). We allow reconsideration and adhere to our former decision as modified and clarified by this opinion.

The trial court held that a taxpayer action brought under ORS 294.100 is a tort claim subject to the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), ORS 30.260 to ORS 30.300, and then granted defendants’ ORCP 21 motions to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff had failed to comply with the notice requirements of OTCA. We reversed, in part by applying specific language of a 1985 amendment to ORS…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Burt v. BlumenauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. United States National Bank v. HeggemeierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. City of Tualatin v. City-County Insurance Services TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Duron v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API