Legal Opinion

United States National Bank v. Heggemeier

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1991No. CV89-0280; CA A66179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants1 petition for review of our order dismissing their appeal for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), allow it and adhere to our former decision.

A judgment in favor of plaintiff was signed, filed and entered on July 2,1990.2 On that date, the Trial Court Administrator’s office erroneously notified the parties that the judgment “has not been entered in the judgment docket * * *.” Accompanying the notice was a postcard that said, in part:

“Please indicate when the document listed below was processed. Thank you.
“United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Junction City Water Control District v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Alt v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Burt v. BlumenauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Safeport, Inc. v. Equipment Roundup & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Garcia v. Oregon Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Arlington Education Ass'n v. Arlington School District No. 3Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Patrick v. OttemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API