Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duron v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. 89-06-23; CA A66673Published

1DissentWarren, P. J.

The majority concludes that ORS 737.310(12) (since amended by Or Laws 1991, ch 768, § 1) precludes SAIF from reallocating employer’s payroll among previously assigned rating classifications. Because I do not believe that that statute limits SAIF’s authority to reallocate payroll, I dissent.

ORS 737.310(12) provides:

“At the time a workers’ compensation guaranty contract is issued, the insurer shall give written notice to the insured of the rating classifications to which the insured’s employees *576are assigned and shall provide an adequate description of work activities in each classification. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burt v. BlumenauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Burt v. BlumenauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API