People v. Odom
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
A jury determined appellant William Grant Odom III possessed three stolen weapons (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (1)), possessed precursors with intent to manufacture methamphetamine (Health and Saf. Code, § 11383, subd. (c)(1)), and endangered two children (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (1)). On appeal, appellant argues the charges were improperly joined and the evidence was insufficient to support the felony child endangerment convictions.
In section I, the unpublished portion of this opinion, we hold the charges were properly joined. In the published portion of this opinion, section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. JaramilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HeitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. LittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. ToneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.