Legal Opinion

People v. Peabody

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1975No. Crim. 1512PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

The issue is the standard of conduct required for a violation of Penal Code section 273 a, subdivision (1), which proscribes “wilfully” causing or permitting a child to be placed in a situation likely to produce great bodily harm or death. We hold that the standard of conduct condemned by the statute is that of criminal negligence and that the trial court’s failure to so instruct the jury compels a reversal.

Because we are reversing on a point of law, we need only briefly summarize the evidence; Appellant brought her four-month-old child to the hospital because “the baby…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Williams v. GarcettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API