Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. County of San Diego
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The”facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
A re-examination of the questions presented in this case serves but to confirm the reasoning and conclusion reached in the Department opinion. The judgment is reversed, and the trial court directed to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
Beatty, C. J., did not participate in the foregoing decision.
*315The following is the opinion above referred to, rendered in Department One, on the 21st of August, 1895:
Britt, C.
Action brought professedly under section 3819, added to the Political Code in 1893 (Stats. 1893, p. 32), for the recovery of alleged illegal taxes paid by plaintiff, under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- San Diego School District v. Board of Supervisors of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Taylor v. Township of AvonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Stone v. County of WoodburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- School District No. 1 v. Town of BridportSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Pomona City School District v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Goodall v. BriteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & PartiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.