Legal Opinion
Talley v. Drumheller
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided November 12, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
This was an action of detinue to recover certain steel tramrails, in which there was a judgment for the defendants.
When this ease was formerly before this court, it was decided that a joint action of detinue could be-maintained by plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error. Talley v. Drumheller, 135 Va. 186, 115 S. E. 517. That decision became the law of the case, and the question is not now open to debate on a second-writ of error. Norfolk & W. R. Co. v. Duke, 107 Va. 764, 60 S. E. 96; Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp., 121 Va. 611, 92 S. E. 684. But if the same question should…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hawley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Oliver v. ForsythSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Texas & N. O. R. v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. State Department of Assessments and TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.