Legal Opinion

State v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.

On the record, there is no question made by the defendant as to the sufficiency of the evidence to be submitted to the jury. The facts are exclusively in the province of the jury to determine. In the exceptions and assignments of error made by the defendant, we can see in law, no error, but will consider the material ones and the law applicable. The first contention of defendant: Should the court have permitted an injured by-stander to exhibit his injuries before the jury? This question we do not think is borne out by the State’s evidence. When Miller started to go into the store, he was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. State v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. FoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API