Legal Opinion
Beattie v. Acer American Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1996No. 96-CV-0111 (DRH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
APPEARANCES:1
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Presently pending in the above-captioned case are Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings by Acer American Corporation (“Acer”), Litton Industries, Inc. (“Litton”) and Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc. (“Konica”). Each of these defendants argues that the claims against it asserted by Susan L. Beat-tie (“Beattie”) are time barred by the applicable statute of limitations.2 For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motions by Litton and Konica. A decision on Acer’s motion will be issued at a later date.
*894 DISCUSSION
I. Motion for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brian Sheppard v. Leon Beerman, as an Individual and in His Official Capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Davidson v. FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- George C. Frey Ready-Mixed Concrete, Inc. v. Pine Hill Concrete Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Sunrise Industrial Joint Venture v. Ditric Optics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Parajecki v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Repetitive Stress Injury LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Saviano v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997