Capital Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
The dispositive issues before this Court are (1) whether the trial judge had jurisdiction to enter the order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, and (2) whether the trial judge erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for the reason that it was time-barred. The Court of Appeals panel below (1) held that the trial judge erred in signing the dismissal order in question because he lacked jurisdiction to sign the order out of term, and (2) did not reach the issue of the timeliness of the filing of the complaint.
Having determined that the trial judge did not err in entering the order…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Mazie Keller v. Prince George's County Prince George's County Department of Social Services, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Buford v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Minton v. Lowe's Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Pinckney v. Van DammeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.