Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Ayers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

The demurrer filed by the plaintiff to the defendant’s further defense and cross-action is based upon his contentions that the defendant’s pleadings do not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense against the plaintiff’s action upon grounds of separation as alleged in the complaint, and do not state facts sufficient to constitute an action against the plaintiff for damages as prayed or the suit money demanded by her counsel.

This brings the plaintiff squarely within the succinct statement in 3 Strong’s N. C. Index, Pleadings, Sec. 19: “The same rules apply to a demurrer to a counterclaim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Meyer v. Fenner & BeaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Best v. . BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anthony v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API