Village of Bennington v. Hawks
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Powers, J.:
The jurisdiction of the court of chancery is essentially civil. It will not, as a rule, interfere to prevent the commission of a crime or to enforce penal or criminal laws. The fact, however, that the result will amount to a restraint of crime will not prevent the court from acting when ever other facts afford a basis for the exercise of its jurisdiction on recognized grounds. In other words, criminality neither affords a basis for, nor does it oust the jurisdiction of the court-of chancery. The mere fact, then, that this defendant violated an ordinance of the plaintiff by moving…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Village of St. Johns v. McFarlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Thebaut v. CanovaSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
- Shamburger v. ScheurrerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- State Board of Health v. Village of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vermont Salvage Corp. v. Village of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- City of Sturgeon v. Wabash Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Napro Development Corp. v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In re Investigation into Programmatic Adjustments to the Standard-Offer Program (Renewable Energy Vermont, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.