Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 22, 1998No. 98-047PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs Austin Anderson and Katherine Stevens, both students at the Stowe Elementary School, seek declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the constitutionality of a part of the Equal Education Opportunity Act, 1997, No. 60 (“Act 60”). The plaintiffs contend that the system of public school funding created by Act 60 for amounts above the general state support grant violates the state constitution for the same reasons we voided the state’s previous public education funding formula in Brigham v. State, 166 Vt. 246, 692 A.2d 384 (1997). We do not reach the merits of this assertion.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. Doria v. University of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Brigham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Town of Cavendish v. Vermont Public Power Supply AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Investigation into Programmatic Adjustments to the Standard-Offer Program (Renewable Energy Vermont, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. J.L. v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Roethke v. Jake's Original Bar and GrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Stowe Citizens for Responsible Government v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Auditor v. Attorney GeneralVermont Superior Court · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API