Legal Opinion

Oregon Post Office Building Corp. v. McVicker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendants in an action for damages arising out of an alleged fraud in the sale of a building. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing the plaintiff’s tender of an amended complaint on the morning of the trial. The amendment added a cause of action for breach of warranty.

It is conceded that if the court had allowed the amendment there would have been no abuse of discretion. See Perkins v. Standard Oil Co., 235 Or 7, 21, 383 P2d 107 (1963). It is also conceded that after the adverse ruling the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Zimmerle v. ChildersOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hillsboro Nat. Bank v. GarbarinoOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Baker v. BROOKMEAD DAIRY, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. C.O. Homes, LLC v. ClevelandOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Phipps v. Air King Manufacturing Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Gibson Bowles, Inc. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Clackamas County Service District No. 1 v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Hart v. Washington County Rural Fire Protection District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API