Legal Opinion

State v. Sexton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1908PublishedCited by 21 opinions

PROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Scott County.— G. Me. HENDERSON, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The questions presented for determination on this record involves the proper construction of the game laws of the State.

Section 6, c. 169, p. 376, Acts 1903, provides as follows:

*38“There shall he no shooting or haying in possession in the open air the implements for shooting on the first day of the week called Sunday, except to transport said implements within or without the State; nor shall any person shoot on or from a public highway.”

The defendant in error, John Sexton, was fined $25 by a justice of the peace of Scott county on a warrant charging Sexton with “having in possession in the open…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  3. Goodbar v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Marler v. WearTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Ex parte MarxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Manning v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Harbison v. Briggs Bros. Paint Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Willard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. City of Chattanooga v. MyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kaiser v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API