Legal Opinion

Peterson Produce Company v. Cheney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1964No. 5-3172PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carretón Harris, Chief Justice.

Only one question is involved on this appeal, vis, are appellant’s purchases of incubators, in 1956, 1957 and 1958, for its commercial hatchery exempt from the Arkansas Compensating (Use) Tax? The Commissioner of Revenues assessed a tax of $1,250.19 against Peterson Produce Company, an Arkansas corporation with principal offices located in Decatur, Benton County, Arkansas, by reason of the purchase of hatchery equipment from outside the state. The company is engaged in a hatchery business at Decatur. The parties stipulated that all legal requirements by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morley v. E. E. Barber Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Scurlock v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Pellerin Laundry Mach. Sales Co. v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Hendricks v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Teague v. ScurlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Bain v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Master Hatcheries, Inc. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Hervey v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API