Teague v. Scurlock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.
This suit is an effort to obtain a tax exemption on commercial poultry feed.
The appellant is engaged in the business of raising chickens and turkeys for the commercial market: he buys day-old chickens and turkeys, feeds them only commercial poultry feed, and then sells them when they reach the size and weight for marketing. We refer to this as the “broiler business”.1 The commercial poultry feed which appellant buys from outside of Arkansas has been held by the appellee, Revenue Commissioner, to be subject to the 2% use tax under Act 487 of 1949 (now found in §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Colbert Mill & Feed Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Grant v. HardageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peterson Produce Company v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Pellerin Laundry Mach. Sales Co. v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Keating v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Keating v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996