Master Hatcheries, Inc. v. Coble
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
The parties stipulate that the question presented is whether plaintiff, a commercial hatchery, is a manufacturing industry or plant within the meaning of G.S. 105-164.4(1) (h).
It is everywhere conceded that the term manufacturing as used in tax statutes is not susceptible of an exact and all-embracing definition, for it has many applications and meanings. Where, as here, the statute does not define the term, courts have resorted to the dictionaries to ascertain its generally accepted meaning and have then undertaken to determine its application to the circumstances of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perdue, Inc. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Hearst Corp. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Peterson Produce Company v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- State v. . ChadbournSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Bain v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- HED, INC. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.