Legal Opinion
Holman Erection Co. v. Orville E. Madsen & Sons, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1983No. C2-82-926PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant Holman Erection Company (Holman) commenced an action against Orville Madsen & Sons, Inc., (Mad-sen), alleging that Madsen had breached a construction contract. Holman claims that Madsen accepted Holman’s bid on a subcontract, and thereby formed a contract, by listing Holman as a proposed subcontractor in a general contract bid Madsen submitted to the City of Moorhead. Holman sought the profits it argued it had lost when Mad-sen awarded the subcontract to a different construction company.
The Clay County District Court granted Madsen’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Savoca Masonry Co., Inc. v. Homes & Son Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Southeast Grading, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Electro-Lab of Aiken, Inc. v. Sharp Construction Co. of Sumter, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- West Construction, Inc. v. Florida Blacktop, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.