Williams v. Windham
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
ODOM, J.
The testimony makes it perfectly clear that defendant’s cattle destroyed plaintiff’s watermelons, cantaloupes and corn.
Defendant contends that other cattle than his depredated on plaintiff’s crops and that there is no way to determine that his cattle did all the damage. He points out that on two different occasions other cattle were found an plaintiff’s premises.
On July 4, 1924, plaintiff, or someone for him, penned some cattle and sent defendant word to come and get them; and the testimony shows that it developed on this occasion only one of defendant's cows was in that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grider v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- McInerney v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Atkinson v. MottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Watkins v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Raziano v. TJ James & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Murff v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bryant v. McCannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Fall v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.