Legal Opinion
A v. Martin v. Unified School District No. 434, Osage County, Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1984No. 82-1868PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the appellant-plaintiff claims that the defendant school board, at the time of the nonre-newal of his contract as school principal, failed to grant him a hearing in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. The trial court gave summary judgment for the defendants, finding that the plaintiff had no constitutionally protected property interest in the job and that the nonrenewal of his contract did not impair his liberty interest. We affirm.
On April 14, 1980, the board of education of Unified School District No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Donald Weathers v. West Yuma County School District R--J--1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Janie McGhee v. Daniel D. Draper, Superintendent, Daniel D. Draper, Leroy Chamberlain, Dale Brown, Edward Billups, J. W. Puckett, and Floyd E. MottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Karr v. CastleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Sipes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Casias v. City of RatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Pierce v. EngleDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.