Legal Opinion
Sipes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 27, 1984No. 82-1365PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff challenges his termination from employment as a preservation packager at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma under the Vietnam Veterans’ Readjustment Act of 1974. Plaintiff contends that (1) the discharge implicated protected property and liberty interests and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- George E. Vanelli, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Reynolds School District No. 7, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Hicks v. City of WatongaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hicks v. City Of WatongaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Dick Dickeson and Beth Weaver v. Deloyd Quarberg and the Board of County Commissioners of Hot Springs County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.