Legal Opinion

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 12, 1974No. 19876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice:

The question to be decided is whether the vesting of title to a mortgaged automobile in the lienholder, by operation of law, and the delivery of. possession of the vehicle to him, because of default in the mortgage payments, constituted such a “change of interest or ownership” as required the lienholder to notify the insurer of the vehicle of such facts, within the meaning of the following policy provision, particularly the emphasized portion thereof:

5. Lienholder: If a mortgage owner, conditional vendor, or assignee is named in the exceptions, loss, if any, under coverage D, F…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Stokes v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Martin v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  4. Anderson v. United States Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Dickerson v. ClelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Isaac v. Gene's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Watts v. St. Katherine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API