Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Cleland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1922No. 10957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action for claim and delivery. The cardinal facts are few and undisputed. G. W. Burdett executed a chattel mortgage to the appellant on two horses. Subsequently he executed a mortgage to the respondent. The appellant, the owner of the senior mortgage, foreclosed his mortgage, and at the foreclosure sale the two horses were sold together. The respondent was present at the sale, made no objection to the sale of the two horses together, but bid at the sale. The appellant bid in the horses, being the highest bidder. Some time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Interstate B. & L. Ass'n v. WatersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Clowney v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API