Manrique v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
Sentencing courts are required to impose restitution as part of the sentence for specified crimes. But the amount to be imposed is not always known at the time of sentencing. When that is the case, the court may enter an initial judgment imposing certain aspects of a defendant's sentence, such as a term of imprisonment, while deferring a determination of the amount of restitution until entry of a later, amended judgment.
We must decide whether a single notice of appeal, filed between the initial judgment and the amended judgment, is sufficient to invoke appellate review of the later-determined…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- United States v. Waseem AlamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Malouf v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Smith, FernandoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Joseph McGreal v. Village of Orland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.