Legal Opinion
Avery Dennison Corp. v. Alien Technology Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 4, 2008No. 08 CV 795PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Alien Technology Corporation’s (“Alien”) Motion to Dismiss or to Transfer Venue (Doc. 12). In its motion, Alien requests that the Court either (1) dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) dismiss the case for improper venue, or (3) transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. The Plaintiff, Avery Dennison Corporation (“Avery”), opposes all aspects of the motion, which is now ripe for adjudication. 1 For the reasons fully articulated below,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. O'LEARY PAINT CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Ali v. Carnegie Institution of WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Global Touch Solutions, LLC v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Beightler v. Produkte Fur Die Medizin AGDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.