Reynolds v. Ryland Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEY, Chief Justice:
This Court accepted this certified question in its original jurisdiction to determine if a subsequent purchaser can sue a builder/vendor under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (SCUPTA).
FACTS:
Plaintiffs 1 filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina-Charleston Division alleging the following cause of action against defendants (Ryland Group) 2 : breach of implied warranty, negligence, and violations of the SCUPTA. Plaintiffs are subsequent purchasers of homes built by the defendant. Plaintiffs discovered inter alia 3…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Maillet v. ATF-Davidson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Terlinde v. NeelySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Skilcraft Sheetmetal, Inc. v. Kentucky MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Wogan Ex Rel. Estate of Wogan v. KunzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Mincey v. World Savings Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
- Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.