Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Ryland Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 2000No. 25118PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

This Court accepted this certified question in its original jurisdiction to determine if a subsequent purchaser can sue a builder/vendor under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (SCUPTA).

FACTS:

Plaintiffs 1 filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina-Charleston Division alleging the following cause of action against defendants (Ryland Group) 2 : breach of implied warranty, negligence, and violations of the SCUPTA. Plaintiffs are subsequent purchasers of homes built by the defendant. Plaintiffs discovered inter alia 3…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Maillet v. ATF-Davidson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Terlinde v. NeelySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Skilcraft Sheetmetal, Inc. v. Kentucky MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Wogan Ex Rel. Estate of Wogan v. KunzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Mincey v. World Savings Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
  4. Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API