Legal Opinion

Terlinde v. Neely

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1980No. 21319PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

This 'action seeks damages for the alleged defective construction of a house. The complaint contains two causes of action, one for breach of implied warranty that the house was “merchantable,” and suitable and fit for its intended purpose, and the other for negligence, recklessness, and wilfulness in the construction of the house by respondents. The matter is here on appeal by the appellants-purchasers from an order by the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the respondents-builders. The material facts are not in dispute and are taken from the Statement of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rutledge v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. Lane v. Trenholm Building CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Brown v. FowlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API