Legal Opinion
Latham v. Faulk
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 6, 1995No. S94A1656PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Justice.
Charles Faulk sued Saralyn Latham for specific performance of a contract to make a will that had been made by Faulk and Latham’s respective predecessors-in-interest. Following a verdict by an advisory jury in favor of Faulk, the trial court entered judgment enforcing the contract and awarding Faulk damages and attorney fees pursuant to *108OCGA § 13-6-11. We reverse the award of attorney fees, but affirm on the remaining issues.
1. After reviewing the record, we hold that the court’s judgment regarding the enforceability of the contract and damages flowing therefrom is supported…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dimambro Northend Associates v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
3Cited by24 opinions
- Quebell P. Parker v. Scrap Metal ProcessorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Merlino v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Physician Specialists in Anesthesia, P.C. v. MacNeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- City of Warner Robins v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Department of Transportation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.