Legal Opinion

Peña v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1998No. 96-50644PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

Samuel Peña, a prisoner, filed a motion on March 25,1996, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e)1 seeking the return of certain property that the United States seized from his home. On August 6, 1996, the United States responded to the motion by stating that the property seized from Peña’s home had been destroyed. Two days later, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas dismissed the *986action as moot without giving Peña a chance to respond or to amend his pleadings. Proceeding pro se and' in forma pauperis, Peña appealed the dismissal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Bazrowx v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hale v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Pena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Lundeen v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API