Legal Opinion

Mobile Housing Board v. Brook

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1970No. 1 Div. 578PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Mobile Housing Board, questions the ruling of the Circuit Court in awarding an attorney’s fee and assessing it as part of the costs in an eminent domain proceeding. The contention is made that Act 715, Acts of Alabama 1967, Regular Session, p. 1552, is void for vagueness and uncertainty. It is also argued that said Act is unconstitutional under Article 1, § 1; Article 1, § 10; Article 1, § 13; and Article 1, § 35, of the Constitution of the State of Alabama, 1901, and under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

The original proceeding to condemn the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Mobile Housing Board v. CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Gano v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Sanitary District of Chicago v. BernsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Jordan v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kershaw v. KershawSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API