Stupka v. Peoples Cab Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Cohen,
It is clear that plaintiff, appellant, is not asserting that appellee caused her physical injuries but rather that appellee caused her financial harm by not obtaining the name or license number of the driver whose car struck the cab from the rear. As there are no prior cases on this particular subject, appellant would have this Court create and impose on cab companies the duty to obtain sufficient information about individuals involved in traffic accidents with cabs to. enable cab passengers at least to know against whom to bring suit.
Common law courts have been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. ByrdMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
- Korn v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pyeritz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Panich v. Iron Wood Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Murphy v. Target ProductsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- O'CONNELL v. Killington, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Pirocchi v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.