Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hunt

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided August 10, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sheryl L. Parker, J.

Defendant is charged with possession of a gambling device (Penal Law § 225.30 [2]) and promoting gambling in the second degree (Penal Law § 225.05). The charges stem from allegations that defendant was running a game of three-card monte.

Defendant moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument on the ground that it is facially insufficient. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted.

*71The factual portion of the accusatory instrument reads as follows: "Deponent states that he observed the defendant standing alone behind a cardboard box with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. Fuerst, New York Court of Sessions, Queens County1895
  3. People v. WilliamsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
  4. People v. BrownCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1982
  5. Metcalf v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  2. People v. DensonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
  3. People v. Li Ai HuaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2009
  4. People v. MohammedCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API