People v. Li Ai Hua
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles S. Lopresto, J.
Defendant moves in an omnibus motion for the following relief: (1) a bill of particulars; (2) discovery; (3) dismissal of the accusatory instrument; (4) suppression of physical evidence; (5) *1143suppression of statement evidence; (6) a Sandoval application; and (7) a reservation of rights. The People have responded to the motion and demand reciprocal discovery. Defendant’s motion is decided as follows:
Defendant Li Ai Hua is charged, under a theory of acting in concert with three codefendants, with promoting gambling in the second degree. (Penal Law §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Mount Pleasant v. ChimentoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Jennifer White v. Andrew CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 2022