Legal Opinion

People v. Li Ai Hua

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided June 5, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles S. Lopresto, J.

Defendant moves in an omnibus motion for the following relief: (1) a bill of particulars; (2) discovery; (3) dismissal of the accusatory instrument; (4) suppression of physical evidence; (5) *1143suppression of statement evidence; (6) a Sandoval application; and (7) a reservation of rights. The People have responded to the motion and demand reciprocal discovery. Defendant’s motion is decided as follows:

Defendant Li Ai Hua is charged, under a theory of acting in concert with three codefendants, with promoting gambling in the second degree. (Penal Law §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Mount Pleasant v. ChimentoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Jennifer White v. Andrew CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API