Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta

I concur with part II of the majority opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment on the named defendant’s cross appeal. Because the facts of this case reveal manifest injustice and represent the very essence of what the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., was intended to redress, I respectfully dissent from part I of the majority opinion.

The jury found that the plaintiffs proved each material element of their claim that the defendant’s actions violated CUTPA. Because the interrogatories submitted to the jury were general in nature, I will…