McKenzie v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, made in proceedings supplementary to execution. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
Motion to dismiss appeal.
The appeal is from an order made in proceedings supplementary to execution, directing appellants, as garnishees, to apply $876 toward the satisfaction of a judgment recovered by plaintiff McKenzie against defendant Hill. The ground of the motion to dismiss is that no notice of such appeal was served upon the defendant Hill.
The undisputed facts in the case are as follows: On the seventeenth day of January, 1907, respondent McKenzie recovered judgment against defendant Hill for the sum of $3,805, and assigned the same to C. M. Craig. Craig prepared an affidavit as the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Adams v. HackettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Estate of McDougaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Trust Co. v. CassidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lilienkamp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- McCutcheon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hustead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.