Legal Opinion
Atlantic County, New Jersey v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 25, 1983No. 82-3087PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This case requires us to decide whether the Secretary of Labor may recover funds advanced to a state or its subdivision under the 1973 version of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (“Act” or “CETA”) when such funds were misspent. Petitioner Atlantic County challenges the Secretary’s authority under the 1973 Act to order repayment of improperly spent funds from sources other than CETA grants. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bell v. New Jersey and Pennsylvania,U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2187, 76 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983), we hold that the 1973 CETA statute did…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
4Cited by15 opinions
- Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. William E. Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Lehigh Valley Manpower Program v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- City of Camden, New Jersey v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Texarkana Metropolitan Area Manpower Consortium v. Raymond Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.