Pennsylvania Railroad v. Midstate Horticultural Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
— This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $13,678.86, representing unpaid freight charges. The defendant was the consignor of interstate shipments of grapes over the plaintiff’s and its connecting lines. The complaint was filed more than three years after the cause of action accrued. The plaintiff pleaded a written agreement of waiver of the statute of limitations executed by the defendant. The defendant interposed a demurrer on the ground that the action was barred by the provisions of section 16, paragraph (3) (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act. The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Transmix Corp. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.