Legal Opinion
Fitanides v. Perry
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 12, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
Plaintiff Fred Fitanides appeals a judgment of the Superior Court, York County, dismissing his complaint, seeking a declaration that action taken by the Saco Board of Appeals approving the division of land abutting his property was null and void. The Superior Court determined that Fitanides was precluded from prosecuting his declaratory judgment action because he had not sought the available direct judicial review within 30 days of the decision of the Board of Appeals. We agree with the Superior Court and affirm the judgment.
Fitanides owns land abutting the property of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colby v. York County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Town of North Berwick v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Fisher v. DameSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Maines v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Standish Telephone Co. v. Saco River Telegraph & Telephone Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Sold, Inc. v. Town of GorhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Caron v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Maine Central Railroad v. Town of DexterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Town of Freeport v. GreenlawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.