Legal Opinion

Sold, Inc. v. Town of Gorham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Seven subdivision developers1 brought a declaratory judgment action challenging a Town of Gorham ordinance requiring collection of impact fees as a condition of approval of subdivisions. The Superior Court (Cumberland County, Crowley, J.) determined that the ordinance violated 30-A M.R.S.A. § 4854 (1996 & Supp.2004), but entered judgment in favor of only one of the plaintiffs. It determined that the remaining plaintiffs were barred by the doctrine of res judicata because they failed to challenge the impact fee in a previous action they had brought against the Town. The remaining…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. National Hearing Aid Centers, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bog Lake Co. v. Town of NorthfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of ArundelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Paul v. Town of LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Darlene F. Edwards v. Cynthia S. BlackmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API