Legal Opinion

Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex International, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 30, 2003No. 1:01-cv-00152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RE: FREE MOTION AND CY-BEX’S CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO INFRINGEMENT OF CLAIM ONE OF PATENT ’061; AND FREE MOTION AND NAUTILUS’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO INFRINGEMENT OF CLAIM ONE OF PATENT ’061.

JENKINS, Senior District Judge.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On December 3, 2001, Free Motion Fitness Inc. (“Free Motion”) filed its Complaint against Cybex International, Inc. (“Cybex”) under the patent laws of the United States, specifically, under Title 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283, 284 and 285 (2000). (Complaint, dated December 3, 2001 (dkt. no. 1).)

On May…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API