Legal Opinion
Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 16, 2005No. 2005-1006Published
1Opinion of the Court
423 F.3d 1343
FREE MOTION FITNESS, INC., (formerly known as Ground Zero Design Corporation), Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Free Motion Fitness, Inc. (formerly known as Ground Zero Design Corporation), Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The Nautilus Group, Inc. (formerly known as Direct Focus, Inc.) and Nautilus Human Performance Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-1006.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
September 16, 2005.
Larry R. Laycock, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas R.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.