Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Lannigan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1895No. 7776PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Johnson District Court. Action by Patrick B. Lannigan against The Atchison, Topeka.& Santa Fe Railroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant brings the case to this court. All the material facts are stated in the opinion herein, filed November 9, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

*111The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.: The defendant in error, who. was plaintiff below, was employed as a brakeman on the railroad operated by the defendant, on a freight-train running between Argentine, Kan., and Marceline, Mo. At 2 o’clock in the morning of March 3, 1890, at Norborne, Mo., his right hand was crushed between the dead-woods of two freight-cars, which he was coupling. This action was prosecuted to recover damages for the injury then received. The petition is very long, and alleges many acts of negligence as grounds of recovery, but at the opening of the trial the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. ConeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Morbach v. Home Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Huggard v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Mangum v. Bullion, Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Runyan v. Kanawha Water & Light Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API