Wise v. Bristol-Myers Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This is a suit for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition. .The parties are citizens of different states.
■ Plaintiff claims that his registered trademark ' “BUpH 3.5” and his common-law, rights to the exclusive use of the word “Buff” are infringed by defendant’s use of the word “Bufferin’’ as the name of defendant’s product. Plaintiff’s product is an antacid tablet for control of gastric acidity and it consists of a mixture of citrated and 'phosphated salts of calcium and sodium. Defendant’s product is a pain reliever for use against headaches, neuralgias and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Steem-Electric Corp. v. Herzfeld-Phillipson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Turner & Seymour Mfg. Co. v. A. & J. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Continental Distilling Corporation v. Old Charter Distillery Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Macaulay v. Malt-Diastase Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Venetianaire Corp. Of America v. A & P Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Intercontinental Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Continental Motors CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- M. & D. Simon Co. v. R. H. MacY & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- National Tuberculosis Ass'n v. Summit County Tuberculosis & Health Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Medi-Flex, Inc. v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.