Legal Opinion

Dodge sCenter v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1988No. H003796PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

Petitioner Dodge Center (Dodge) seeks a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (/), to vacate a partial summary adjudication in favor of real parties in interest Anderson and Naumann and to compel summary adjudication in favor of Dodge. The issue is whether Dodge, a retail seller of motor vehicles, may be liable to real parties based on its sale of a vehicle to an unlicensed adult driver (Marvin L. Adams, Jr.), who, three months after the sale, collided with a motorcycle on which real parties were riding, injuring them.

The underlying…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Tucker v. LombardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Murray v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lindstrom v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Krawitz v. RuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Castillo-Plaza v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Carolina Cable Contractors, Inc. v. HattawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API