Legal Opinion

Graham Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1932No. 12606PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

The Graham National Bank has prosecuted this appeal from a judgment denying it a recovery against the First National Bank of Graham, as garnishee. The purpose of the suit in garnishment was to subject a negotiable promissory note made payable to Mrs. Fannie Hill, wife of W. A. Hill, to the payment of a judgment which the plaintiff recovered against W. A. Hill in the main suit. It was alleged in the answer of the garnishee that it held the note for collection and that it recited on its face that it was the separate property of Mrs. Fannie Hill, but that the garnishee did not know whether it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. PurintonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Cameron v. FayTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wood v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Moursund v. PriessTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Price v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Suloch Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Putman & Putman, Inc. v. Capitol Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. First National Bank in Dallas v. LampmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Amarillo National Bank v. ListonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Amarillo National Bank v. ListonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API