Breslau v. Sakow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order of the Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee L. Holzman, S.), entered on or about April 15, 1994, which, after trial, inter alia, dismissed all objections to the account based on claims of respondent-cross-appellant Walter Sakow’s fraud, unjust enrichment, and actions as de facto executor except as to any *480properties which, at any time, were in the name of W.E.D. Corporation, and. required respondent-cross-appellant Walter Sakow. to account with respect to properties of the W.E.D. Corporation, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts, to the extent of reinstating the claims for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Wechsler v. BowmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- In re the Estate of RothkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- In Re FischerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Kohan v. NehmadiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Hodge Ex Rel. Skiff v. HodgeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Steinfeld Ex Rel. Estate of General Vision Services, Inc. v. Richard A. Eisner & Co. (In Re General Vision Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.