Legal Opinion

Melendez v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1989No. 01221PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This case presents the issue of whether, under the Financial Responsibility Law, an Assigned Claims Plan insurer may deny a claimant’s demand for recovery where the claimant has extinguished the insurer’s right to subrogation against a tortfeasor. We find that under these circumstances, the insurer may deny recovery to the claimant.

Appellant Nereida Melendez sustained injuries in an automobile accident on December 14, 1984. On December 12, 1986, she filed a complaint seeking first-party benefits from Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) under the Penn sylvania Motor Vehicle…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Curry v. Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Bobb v. KraybillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Rossi v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Demmery v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dyer v. TravelersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Eugene A. Fisher, Administrator of the Estate of Julie Lynn Fisher, Deceased v. Usaa Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Hagans v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Quarry Office Park Associates v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Archer v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API