Legal Opinion
Thorn EMI North America, Inc. v. Intel Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 28, 1996No. Civil Action 95-199-RRMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKELVIE, District Judge.
This is a patent case. Plaintiff Thorn EMI North America, Inc. (“TENA”) is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 4,486,943 (“the ’943 patent”). The ’943 patent claims an improved method for fabricating metal oxide semiconductor (“MOS”) field effect transistors in a large scale integrated circuit. On March 29, 1995, TENA filed a complaint against defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) alleging infringement of the ’943 patent. On November 14,1995, Intel filed a motion for partial summary judgment that Intel processes P652 and P852 (revisions 9 and 10) do not infringe the ’943…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emi Group North America, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Promega Corp. v. Novagen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Thorn EMI North America, Inc. v. Intel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- System Evergreen v. Concrete SystemsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996