Legal Opinion
Emi Group North America, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 30, 1998No. 97-1137, 97-1153PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this patent infringement case the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, following a two-day Markman hearing on the issue of “claim construction,” granted summary judgment in favor of Intel Corporation, holding that three of Intel’s manufacturing processes do not infringe United States Patent No. 4,486,943 (the ’943 patent) owned by EMI Group North America. 1 EMI appeals. Intel cross-appeals, inter alia, the ruling that Intel is not licensed under the ’943 patent. We affirm the district court’s judgment that the claims are not infringed,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Demarini Sports, Inc. v. Worth, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Netword, LLC v. Centraal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., and Netscape Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.